This paper will focus on the case conceptualization and treatment plan for the client. It will include the use of cognitive theory as it relates to the client’s concerning issues. In addition this paper will focus on devising specific goals and interventions as it related to the need of the client. The writer will briefly discuss the use of existential theory as it relates to the clients concerning issues. Furthermore, this paper will focus on spiritual challenges and provide a more spiritual outlook in relationship with the therapeutic approach used to assist the client. Lastly this paper will provide scholarly references to further elaborate on the theories used to develop the goals and intervention to effectively benefit the client. Keywords: case conceptualization, treatment plan, existential therapy
Conceptualization and Treatment Plan Case of London
Case conceptualization and treatment planning is the practice used by therapist to determine a client’s diagnosis, goals, and treatment plan that is most effective in resolving the issues surrounding the clients diagnosis. It is essential that the client’s treatment plan is specific to the individual and is appropriate and relational to the needs of the client to assist in the client’s aid. Case conceptualization and treatment planning ultimately assist therapist in finding methods of therapy that will work in relations to their client’s needs. Existential therapy is one therapeutic approach. Existential psychotherapy is defined as squarely and soberly confronting the ultimate concerns and sometimes tragic existential facts of life (Diamond, 2011). This therapy focusses on the positive approach and the potential of the human race. Additionally, this therapeutic approach helps individuals to view life more positively. Existential therapy is an effective tool to assist in the conceptualization of a client’s problem and developing an effective method of treatment.
The Effects of Nature and Nurture
Over the years there has been controversy surrounding the nature versus nurture theory. Numerous studies have been conducted to determine which component of nature versus nurture has more of an impact on adolescent development. Currently, there is no clear assumption on whether nature or nurture has more effect on adolescent development. Gruber (2013) suggest that nature is the key component to what determines adolescent’s development and nurture is an additional component, while other studies suggest the opposite. Both nature and nurture components must be studied to further understand how adolescent development is affected. This paper explores Gruber’s research in addition to other researchers to examine whether both nature and nurture are key components to adolescent development. Nature
There are various reasons why one may be convinced that genetics play a part in his or her intelligence. This reasoning is defined as the nature theory. Nature is categorized as an individual’s mental capacity based on the genetic makeup of the individual that he or she was born with (Gruber, 2013). Nature compasses various aspects of genetic makeup such as an individual’s aggression, behavior, intelligence, and personality. According to Gruber (2013) nature is the key component of adolescent development. An individual’s genetic materials provide him or her with physical equipment that makes him or her who he or she is. These genetics make an individual who he or she is and is passed down to his or her descendants. Lastly, nature is an essential part of an individual’s life and has an effect on the individual’s development and outcome in life.
An individual’s environment can shape an adolescent’s development just as much as internal factors. Nurture is categorized as the environmental surrounds and aspects that an individual is exposed to that can help shape the individual’s...
References: Belsky, J, and M Pluess. "The Nature (and Nurture?) of Plasticity in Early Human Development." Sage Journals. 4.4 (2009): 345-351.
Bronfenbrenner, U, and S Ceci
D’Onofrio, B. "Nature vs. Nurture." Encyclopedia of Infant and Early Childhood Development. (2008): 395–405. Print.
Ellis, B, and W Boyce. "Development and Psychopathology."Cambridge Journal. 23.1 (2011): 1-5.
Gruber, T. "Nature, nurture, and knowledge acquisition."International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 71.2 (2013): n. page. Print.
Hanscombe, k, C Haworth, et al. "The nature (and nurture) of children." Learning and Individual Differences. 20.5 (2010): 549–553. Print.
Plomin, R, N Shakeshaft, A McMillan, and M Trzaskowski. "Nature, nurture, and expertise." Intelligence. (2013): n. page. Web. 21 Jul. 2013.
Reif, A, M Rosler, et al. "Nature and Nurture Predispose to Violent Behavior: Serotonergic Genes and Adverse Childhood Environment."Neuropsychopharmacology. (2007): 2375–2383. Print.
Sameroff, A. (2010), A Unified Theory of Development: A Dialectic Integration of Nature and Nurture. Child Development, 81: 6–22
Shonkoff, J, and A Garner
Please join StudyMode to read the full document