control

Topics: 1916, 1978, 1946 Pages: 19 (7791 words) Published: May 15, 2014
The current issue and full text archive of this journal is available at www.emeraldinsight.com/1463-5771.htm

BIJ
19,4/5

Evolving benchmarking
practices: a review for research
perspectives

444

Paul Hong
Department of Information Operations and Technology Management, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, USA

Soon W. Hong
Department of Industrial Engineering and Management,
Youngdong University, Chungbuk, South Korea

James Jungbae Roh
Rohrer College of Business, Rowan University, Glassboro,
New Jersey, USA, and

Kihyun Park
Department of Management, Robert Morris University, Moon Township, Pennsylvania, USA
Abstract
Purpose – The purpose of this study is to review a major section of the literature on benchmarking practices in order to achieve better perspectives for emerging benchmarking research streams. Design/methodology/approach – The paper examines the benchmarking literature and presents a framework that suggests evolving patterns of firms’ benchmarking practices. This paper examines the studies published in Benchmarking: An International Journal and other articles related to benchmarking practices in major Strategic Management, OM/SCM, and Technology Management journals from 2001 to 2010.

Findings – Benchmarking remains an important strategic tool of business in turbulent times. Five research dimensions for benchmarking are discussed in terms of the following: strategy-based benchmarking; operational effectiveness-based benchmarking; technical efficiency-based benchmarking; and micro-macro integrative benchmarking. For sustainable competitive advantage, benchmarking goes beyond the operational level and moves into a wide range of value chain, strategic, operational, and project levels.

Research limitations/implications – The study contributes to the benchmarking literature by identifying key areas of benchmarking. It reflects a qualitative orientation, but future research may achieve a more systematic and quantitative analysis of the benchmarking literature. Originality/value – This review paper is unique in that it examines the benchmarking literature and summarizes the results in order to gain a proper understanding of benchmarking and provide perspectives for future research.

Benchmarking: An International
Journal
Vol. 19 No. 4/5, 2012
pp. 444-462
q Emerald Group Publishing Limited
1463-5771
DOI 10.1108/14635771211257945

Keywords Emerging benchmarking practices, Sustainable competitive advantage, Turbulent environment, Literature review, Supply chain management, Competitive advantage, Benchmarking
Paper type Literature review

Introduction
Benchmarking is recognized as “an essential tool for continuous improvement of quality” Dattakumar and Jagadeesh (2003). Over the years benchmarking practices have continually evolved in diverse ways. Certainly, benchmarking is an important business practice priority. The purpose of benchmarking is to systematically identify the processes and performance outcomes of an outstanding organization with those of its competitors as well as to compare processes and outcomes within the organization itself in the constantly changing business environment (Bemowski, 1991; Maire, 2002; Freytag and Hollensen, 2001; Dervitsiotis, 2000; Vaziri, 1992; O’Dell and Grayson, 2000; Still and Strang, 2009). This comparative effort is essential for individuals, organizations, and industries to improve their business processes and attain their performance goals. In fact, the unique aim of Benchmarking: An International Journal is to “examine a radical business process that is revolutionizing established practice and performance.” Over the years there have been marked changes in the ways in which organizations approach benchmarking. The aim of this paper is to review these changes in relation to benchmarking in the past ten years. Specific research questions are:

RQ1. How has the nature and the scope of benchmarking changed over the years? RQ2. What are the...

References: Agndal, H. and Nordin, F. (2009), “Consequences of outsourcing for organizational capabilities:
some experiences from best practice”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol
Ahmed, A.M., Kayis, B. and Amornsawadwatana, S. (2007), “A review of techniques for risk
management in projects”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol
Ahmed, A.M., Zairi, M. and Alwabel, S.A. (2006), “Global benchmarking for internet and
e-commerce applications”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol
Al-Mashari, M. (2007), “A benchmarking study of experiences with electronic government”,
Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol
Anand, G. and Kodali, R. (2008), “Benchmarking the benchmarking models”, Benchmarking:
An International Journal, Vol
Asrofah, T., Zailani, S. and Fernando, Y. (2010), “Best practices for the effectiveness of
benchmarking in the Indonesian manufacturing companies”, Benchmarking:
Ball, A., Bowerman, M. and Hawksworth, S. (2000), “Benchmarking in local government under a
central government agenda”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol
Bamberger, P. and Fiegenbaum, A. (1996), “The role of strategic reference points in explaining
the nature and consequences of human resource strategy”, Academy of Management
Bemowski, K. (1991), “The benchmarking bandwagon”, Quality Progress, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 19-24.
Berger, T. and Bristow, G. (2009), “Competitiveness and the benchmarking of nations – a critical
reflection”, International Advances in Economic Research, Vol
Bjorklund, M. (2010), “Benchmarking tool for improved corporate social responsibility in
purchasing”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol
Bogan, C.E. and English, M.J. (1994), Benchmarking for Best Practices: Winning Through
Innovative Adaptation, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Bouchereau, V. and Rowlands, H. (2000), “Methods and techniques to help quality function
deployment (QFD)”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol
Boxwell, R.J. (1994), Benchmarking for Competitive Advantage, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.
Bradsher, K. (2010), “China’s illegal rare Earth mines face government crackdown”, The New York
Times, available at: www.nytimes.com/2010/12/30/business/global/30smuggle.html?hp
Brandmeier, R.A. and Rupp, F. (2010), “Benchmarking procurement functions: causes for
superior performance”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol
Brown, K.A. and Hyer, N.L. (2007), “Archeological benchmarking: Fred Harvey and the service
profit chain, Circa 1876”, Journal of Operations Management, Vol
Camp, R.C. (1989), Benchmarking: The Search for Industry Best Practices that Lead to Superior
Performance, ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee, WI.
Camp, R.C. (1995), Business Process Benchmarking: Finding and Implementing Best Practices,
ASQC Quality Press, Milwaukee, WI.
Cassell, C., Nadin, S. and Gray, M.O. (2001), “The use and effectiveness of benchmarking in
SMEs”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol
Chia, A., Goh, M. and Hum, S.H. (2009), “Performance measurement in supply chain entities:
balanced scorecard perspective”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol
Choy, K.L., Chow, H.K.H., Lee, W.B. and Chan, F.T.S. (2007), “Development of performance
measurement system in managing supplier relationship for maintenance logistics
Codling, S. (1996), Best Practice Benchmarking: An International Perspective, Gulf Publishing,
Houston, TX.
Dane, E. and Pratt, M.G. (2007), “Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making”,
Academy of Management Review, Vol
Dattakumar, R. and Jagadeesh, R. (2003), “A review of literature on benchmarking”,
Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol
Dawkins, P., Feeny, S. and Harris, M.N. (2007), “Benchmarking firm performance”,
Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol
Debnath, R.M. and Shankar, R. (2008), “Benchmarking telecommunication service in India:
an application of data envelopment analysis”, Benchmarking: An International Journal,
Denrell, J. (2005), “Selection Bias and the Perils of Benchmarking”, Harvard Business Review,
Vol
Dertouzos, M.L., Lester, R.K. and Solow, R.M. (1989), Made in America: Regaining the Productive
Edge, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Dervitsiotis, K.N. (2000), “Benchmarking and business paradigm shifts”, Total Quality
Management & Business Excellence, Vol
Ernst, H. and Teichert, T. (1998), “The R and D/marketing interface and single informant bias in
NPD research: an illustration of a benchmarking case study”, Technovation, Vol
Evans, J.R. and Dean, J.W. (2002), Total Quality: Management, Organization and Strategy,
South-Western College Publishing, Cincinatti, OH.
Fawcett, S.E., Allred, C., Magnan, G.M. and Ogden, J. (2009a), “Benchmarking the viability of
SCM for entrepreneurial business model design”, Benchmarking: An International Journal,
Fawcett, S.E., Wallin, C., Allred, C. and Magnan, G. (2009b), “Supply chain information-sharing:
benchmarking a proven path”, Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol
Folland, S., Goodman, A.C. and Stano, M. (2001), The Economics of Health and Health Care, 6th
ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
Ford, M.W. and Evans, J.R. (2001), “Baldrige assessment and organizational learning: the need
for change management”, Quality Management Journal, Vol
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Control Mechanisms Essay
  • Essay on Corporate Cost Control Strategies
  • Management Control System Design Essay
  • Controls for Differentiated Strategies Research Paper
  • Critically Evaluate the Impact of Globalization on Management Control System Essay
  • Essay about Managerial Functions: Plan, Organize, Lead, Control
  • Xerox Control Process Essay
  • Quality Control Research Paper

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free