As kids, growing up we are exposed to movies such as "Tarzan" and "The Jungle Book" where the children of the movies are raised by animals. To us it seems to be "the good life" and we desire the freedom those children in the movies have. However, there are children who are actually "raised" by animals. They are called feral children. They are often neglected or abused by their parents. Some run away to find shelter within the wild, while others are forced to live in dilapidated conditions with a vast amount of lacking human interactions. This is where the debate of whether nature or nurture plays the role in the child's development. Does a child develop from genetic factors or does the mind begin as a tabula rasa and form based upon environmental factors? Since both of these are theories, neither of them can be proven, but comparing and contrasting them can give one the means to decide if human development is based upon nature or nurture.
Nature refers to an individual's innate qualities or nativism. For example, nature is in your genes. The physical and personality traits determined by your genes stay the same no matter where you were born and raised. This would mean that your personality, mannerisms, intelligence, phobias, ailments, and even sexuality are determined by your genetic code developed after conception. With this idea, a human being would not have a choice on any of their developmental characteristics, everything would be pre-determined.
Nurture refers to personal experiences or empiricisms/behaviorisms. For example, nurture refers to your childhood, or how you were brought up. Someone could be born with genes to give them a normal height, but be malnourished in childhood, resulting in stunted growth and a failure to develop as expected. Once again, your personality, mannerisms, intelligence, phobias, ailments, and even sexuality would be dependent upon on what you surround yourself by and what influences you to develop from a young age. This is...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document